← Home · Geophysics

Electrical Resistivity Surveys & Vertical Electrical Sounding in Milwaukee

Together, we solve the challenges of tomorrow.

LEARN MORE →

Milwaukee’s subsurface is a mixed bag. Glacial till over Silurian dolomite, buried river channels near the Menomonee Valley, lake-effect clays along the shore. You can’t assume uniform stratigraphy from one lot to the next. We run electrical resistivity surveys here because drilling alone misses lateral transitions that matter for foundation design or environmental delineation. A CPT test gives you point data, but resistivity profiles show the bigger picture between boreholes. When a site sits over the Niagara Escarpment bedrock or an old filled-in ravine, we need to map the contact without punching twenty borings. That’s where Vertical Electrical Sounding earns its place in your site investigation budget.

Resistivity doesn’t replace drilling in Milwaukee—it tells you where to drill and what the geology is doing between the boreholes.

Our approach and scope

The equipment we deploy in Milwaukee is a multi-electrode resistivity system with 72 to 84 takeouts, typically spaced at 10 or 20 feet depending on target resolution. For VES work, we use a Schlumberger array with AB/2 expanding from 5 to 500 feet. Winter field work in Milwaukee means dealing with frozen ground, so we pour saltwater around electrode stakes to maintain contact resistance below 2 kOhm—standard practice here between November and March. Data inversion runs through Res2DInv or EarthImager, with smoothness-constrained least-squares. On sites with known fill history, like parts of the Harbor District, we often pair resistivity with MASW surveys to separate stiffness layers from conductivity contrasts. When grain size distribution matters for hydraulic conductivity estimates, the lab side runs grain size analysis on split-spoon samples from the boreholes we use for ground-truthing.
Electrical Resistivity Surveys & Vertical Electrical Sounding in Milwaukee
Technical reference image — Milwaukee

Local geotechnical context

A warehouse redevelopment on fill along the Kinnickinnic River ran into trouble. Geoprobe refusal at 15 feet in spots suggested shallow rock, but it turned out to be boulders in glacial till, not continuous dolomite. They drove deep foundations everywhere, overspending by six figures. A resistivity line before the drilling campaign would have shown the till-bedrock interface dipping west under the site, not a uniform refusal surface. Misreading refusal as bedrock is a classic Milwaukee problem. On contaminated sites, skipping resistivity means your monitoring well network might straddle a plume boundary without actually capturing it. That’s six months of wasted quarterly sampling before anyone notices the concentration trend doesn’t make sense.

Need a geotechnical assessment?

Reply within 24h.

Email: contact@geotechnicalengineering1.org

Technical parameters

ParameterTypical value
Typical investigation depth (VES)100 to 400 ft below ground surface
Electrode array typesWenner, Schlumberger, Dipole-Dipole
Data acquisition systemMulti-channel, 72–84 electrodes
Contact resistance target< 2 kOhm (saltwater prep in winter)
Inversion softwareRes2DInv / EarthImager
Reporting deliverablesResistivity cross-sections, depth-to-bedrock maps, plume boundary delineation

Other technical services

01

2D Electrical Resistivity Tomography

Multi-electrode profiling with Wenner or dipole-dipole arrays. We target depths down to 100 feet for mapping bedrock surface, clay lenses, or leachate plumes in brownfield sites around the 30th Street Corridor.

02

Vertical Electrical Sounding

Schlumberger array VES for one-dimensional resistivity depth soundings. Common application: estimating depth to dolomite before setting caisson lengths or checking for saturated organics in former wetland areas.

03

Borehole-to-Surface Resistivity

Combining downhole electrodes with surface arrays to resolve thin layers or fracture zones. Useful where the Maquoketa shale confining unit needs verification for deep excavation dewatering plans.

Relevant standards

ASTM D6431-18 Standard Guide for Using the Direct Current Resistivity Method, ASTM D5778-20 Standard Test Method for Performing Electronic Friction Cone and Piezocone Penetration Testing of Soils (for CPT cross-referencing), IBC Chapter 18 Soils and Foundations

Quick answers

What does a resistivity survey cost for a typical Milwaukee site?

For a standard 2D line or a VES sounding at one location, budget between US$640 and US$1,090 depending on depth, array length, and site access conditions.

Can resistivity tell the difference between dolomite and shale in Milwaukee?

Yes, usually. Silurian dolomite has high resistivity, while the Maquoketa shale below it is conductive. The contrast is clear in most profiles, but we always ground-truth with at least one borehole.

How does frozen ground affect the survey?

Frozen surface soil increases contact resistance at the electrodes. We pre-wet electrode positions with saltwater to keep resistance low enough for good data quality during winter months.

How deep can you see with VES?

Maximum depth is roughly AB/3, so with a 500-foot current electrode spread we reach about 150 to 170 feet. Deeper targets need longer spreads or a different array geometry.

Do you combine resistivity with other methods?

Yes, often. Resistivity plus MASW gives us both conductivity and stiffness profiles. Adding CPT or SPT boreholes provides calibration points so the geophysical interpretation matches real soil behavior.

Location and service area

We serve projects in Milwaukee and surrounding areas.

View larger map